Fossil Men's Nate Quartz Watch
Stainless Steel Chronograph Watch for Men, Color: Black
Price as of 2026-06-05. Check Amazon for the current price.
Quick Decision
Price Intelligence
- Budget:$43–$65
- Mid-range:$65–$124
- Premium:$124+← You are here
Is This Right For You?
- •Buyers who prioritize quality over price in Mens Watches
- •Risk-averse buyers — 23,355+ reviews give a highly reliable picture
- •You're on a tight budget — $41 above the category average of $102
- •Casio Men's MDV106-1AV 200M Black Dive Watch offers a better rating (4.6/5) at a similar or lower price ($66)
- •Invicta Mens Pro Diver Quartz Watch — 55% cheaper at $65 (Score A)
- •Fossil Men's Watch — higher rated at 4.7/5 ($117)
📊 Based on data analysis of 9 products in this category.
Mubboo Score: B+
How we calculate the Mubboo Score
Quality (45%): customer rating, normalized to a 10-point scale
Popularity (35%): review volume vs the category leader, log-scaled
Value (20%): price position vs other Mens Watches
Computed from live Amazon rating, review count, and price across 9 Mens Watches available to US consumers · last refreshed 2026-06-05.
How It Compares
This Product Fossil Men's Nate Quartz Watch | Most Popular Casio Men's MDV106-1AV 200M Black Dive Watch | Best Rated Fossil Men's Watch | Best Value Invicta Mens Pro Diver Quartz Watch | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $143 | $66.26 | $117 | $64.95 |
| Rating | 4.5/5 | 4.6/5 | 4.7/5 | 4.7/5 |
| Reviews | 23,355 | 59,747 | 21,064 | 19,533 |
| Mubboo Score | B+ | A | A- | A |
What buyers say about Mens Watches
Themes from buyer reviews across this category — not review data for this specific model.
Check case size for a comfortable fit, especially on smaller wrists, and be aware that automatic movements may require time regulation for accuracy.
- Exceptional value for money
- Solid build quality and durability
- Stylish and attractive design
- Comfortable to wear
- Easy-to-read displays
- Backlight issues (weak or absent)
- Movement accuracy problems
- Oversized case dimensions
Expert Picks in Mens Watches
- Apple Watch SE (3rd generation) — iPhone owners who want to stay connected and track health and fitness
- Google Pixel Watch 4 — Android phone owners wanting health tracking, notifications, and smart-home control
Category recommendations from independent expert publications. Source links in References.
Related Video Reviews
- 📹 THESE are the best watches of 2026 (so far) — Britt Pearce
- 📹 7 Watches You Should NEVER Buy in 2026 — The Watch Bros
- 📹 7 Watches That Make People Think You're Rich — Under $150 — The Watch Bros
About Fossil
- 3 products in our database
- Average rating: 4.6/5 across all products
- Price range: $97.50 – $143
- Categories: Mens Watches, Womens Watches
If not the Men's Nate Quartz Watch, consider these
Featured in Our Reviews
Bottom Line
Fossil Men's Nate Quartz Watch earns Mubboo Score B+. Priced at $143 — a premium option, above the category average of $102. Rated 4.5/5 from 23,355+ reviews. Strong buy if: buyers who prioritize quality over price in mens watches, risk-averse buyers. Skip if: you're on a tight budget — Casio Men's MDV106-1AV 200M Black Dive Watch (Score A, $66) may fit better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Fossil Men's Nate Quartz Watch worth buying in 2026?
It earns a Mubboo Score of B+, with a 4.5/5 rating from 23,355 reviews — better than 33% of Mens Watches we track.
How much does the Fossil Men's Nate Quartz Watch cost?
It is currently $143 — premium-tier pricing for Mens Watches.
How does the Men's Nate Quartz Watch compare to other Mens Watches?
The category's most-reviewed alternative is the Casio Men's MDV106-1AV 200M Black Dive Watch (4.6/5, 59,747 reviews, $66.26). The Men's Nate Quartz Watch carries a Mubboo Score of B+ vs A.
Sources & References
Products available through US retailers. Prices in USD. Sales tax varies by state and is not included.
Mubboo may earn a commission on purchases made through affiliate links. This does not affect our Mubboo Score, product rankings, or editorial judgments. Prices are accurate as of the last sync (2026-06-05) and may change.